![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
I was wrong about start Nazr. I don't think Rasho is playing very well but he's doing much better than Nazr and Oberto. For me is tough to say who is playing better because today's game was only the 4th that I could see this season. So I thought that I would see the playoffs Nazr, playing agressive, but he and Oberto are LOST on the system. Rasho know where he needs to be. I just hope Rasho can do a better job on the rebs. It's very sad to see that Oberto and Nazr look that lost with already 41 games in the season.
__________________ "We would have two less championships here if it wasn't for Manu Ginobili," Popovich said. "In my book, Manu Ginobili is the stud of the world. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
Nazr also looks lost. He missed a lot of rotations. He's with this team in the last 11 months, how the hell he can be so lost in the system?
__________________ "We would have two less championships here if it wasn't for Manu Ginobili," Popovich said. "In my book, Manu Ginobili is the stud of the world. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
Take Beno. Sure, he isn't really getting more time than last year, but look at what he's doing with the time. Much better than last year. Oberto's no rookie, but he's no Sabonis, either. And if you have doubts about Nazr, think back to his play in the postseason last year: is he really a worse player than last year? Regards, tk |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
Makes me start to wonder about "The System". How hard can it be, really? Are we talking rocket science? Is there anyway it can be simplified so that guys like Nazr and Oberto can just play instead of doing math on the floor? |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
|
I love Nazr and know he's better than the way he's been playing!!! He needs to step his game up and be the center we desperatley need. I know that he could be better than Rasho in all areas of the game. What's his problem though??
__________________ ![]() ![]() Coach Billy Gillispie loves UK, Dr Pepper, & the Spurs! |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
They are both seriously under-achieveing. |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
|
Rasho has been playing great. Particularly on defense. He does alter shots very well. I dont think his few bad games/few mistakes in some games outweigh how well he's been playing lately and how important he's been. He's totally deserving of the starting spot from my point of view. |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
|
Chalk one up for Rasho. I thought the block at the end of the 4th qtr was really huge. And he got an offensive rebound and tapped a rebound to Tim who bounced it off Kukoc's face, all those plays added up to helping the team win.
|
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
|
I feel better when Rasho is in, at least he know what he's doing, Nazr is more aggressive but he's lost on both ends of the court
__________________ "We would have two less championships here if it wasn't for Manu Ginobili," Popovich said. "In my book, Manu Ginobili is the stud of the world. |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
|
#19
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#20
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
He is alright at most though, lets be real. People in here saying he is doing great are crazy, he is doing far from great, just better than the other bad Centers we have right now.
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
|
#21
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#22
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() Tim Duncan is a…he’s a pimp. - Ron Artest |
|
#25
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
BTW Mom I WILL JUST LET it go like somene said, I said what I need to about Rasho and so on and thats how I stand, the guy is just not that good IMO.
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. Last edited by Rzarector7; 01-18-06 at 11:37 PM. |
|
#26
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
|
#27
| ||||
| ||||
|
Rasho really impressed me today in the sense that he made some clutch defensive plays and he hustled for those two key offensive rebounds. Rasho is still one awful rebounder for a seven footer but I'll be damn if those weren't the two most important boards he's collected all season. Even with the weak stats, he brought some hustle and energy for a change in the 4th and it paid off. Props to him for that.
__________________ Bah. |
|
#28
| ||||
| ||||
|
Oh how I yearn for the day when we can be blessed with a center who can "impress" us on such a regular basis that we are unable to single out every individual positive act he was part of. Sadly it appears that such a center is NOT on our team at this moment. |
|
#29
| ||||
| ||||
|
neither of them did anything special or out of the ordinary for 3 quarters but Rasho did step up in the 4th with offensive rebounds and that block.. to be fair, rasho didn't seee much court time in the first half because of foul trouble.
|
|
#30
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. Last edited by Rzarector7; 01-19-06 at 12:58 AM. |
|
#31
| ||||
| ||||
| http://http://www.mysanantonio.com/s....180b21fa.html Spurs teammates have faith in Nesterovic's talents Web Posted: 01/19/2006 12:26 AM CST Mike Monroe Express-News Staff Writer Rasho Nesterovic didn't score a point in the Spurs' 95-92 victory over the Milwaukee Bucks at the AT&T Center, missing his only shot and both his free throws. His teammates and coaches, though, understand the depth of Nesterovic's contribution to their 30th victory of the season. He was as vital on the defensive block and on the offensive glass as Michael Finley was important behind the 3-point line. In the final 5 1/2 minutes Nesterovic blocked a shot by Milwaukee's Jamaal Magloire, grabbed two offensive rebounds, one of which was turned into a Finley 3-pointer, blocked a would-be layup by the Bucks' T.J. Ford, and altered a shot by Michael Redd with 56 seconds left and the Spurs ahead by just two points. It has been rare to see Nesterovic on the court in crunch time of close games this season. Ordinarily, 14-year veteran Robert Horry joins Tim Duncan for the late stages of such games. But on Wednesday Horry was on the bench, in street clothes, nursing a lower abdominal strain, so Nesterovic had a chance to make some of his most meaningful plays of the season. He did not disappoint, no matter how tepid his box score line might appear. "Nobody is ever going to say, 'Oh, look at what Rasho is doing,'" said Manu Ginobili, as popular as any Spur, even on a night when he missed nine of 14 shots. "But there are reasons why he is starting and playing so many minutes and doing good. The team trusts him. We know that he is most of the time in the right spot at the right time, so we can trust him and rely on him." Nesterovic has started all but one of the Spurs' 39 games this season and played nearly twice as many minutes as backup center Nazr Mohammed, who replaced him in the starting lineup late last season and then started every playoff game in the Spurs' championship run. He is the least productive of the Spurs' starters, but content with his role, especially when he knows he has made a solid contribution to a victory. Spurs' coach Gregg Popovich, while occasionally frustrated by Nesterovic's reluctance to assert himself on offense, was happy to see his aggression on the offensive glass and at the defensive end. "He had a blocked shot and got some rebounds and gave us that blink that we needed," Popovich said. "We were prepared that (Andrew) Bogut wasn't going to do to us what he did to us in Milwaukee, where he got every offensive board and stuck it back in. But Rasho did a good job." One of the things Bogut did to the Spurs on Dec. 20, in Milwaukee, was to make a shot off an in-bounds lob pass at the end of overtime, giving the Bucks a 109-107 victory. Nesterovic had the defensive assignment on Bogut on that play, but he insisted he gave no thought to it as he approached Wednesday's game. "No," he said. "It's done. We just wanted to come in and not let them outrebound us like in that game. We tried to do as good a job on the boards as possible." __________________________________________________ ___________ Blake and rzarector7, why don't we defer to the opinions that the actual coach and players have rather than speculate on who is better? Just a suggestion.
__________________ It is what it is -- Bruce Bowen When everyone thinks alike, no one thinks.-- Bill Walton Last edited by curiousspirit; 01-19-06 at 02:07 AM. |
|
#32
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
He did well last night at a certain point I understand that, but why focus on him so muchin here and make threads nightly when he is not the focal point or even the 5th best player on the team? He does some things, so do the other starters and they need to be talked about more IMO than Rasho does, he doesn't do what Bruce does even nightly nor produce like him out there, hell Finley is bigger to the team off the bench IMO than Rasho's role. Rasho is treated like some star in here and someone had the nerve to say he was playing great ball in here earlier on which makes me cringe. Lets not fool ourselves he is a role player who is decent, good on D at times because he knows where to be, thats all he is, then again that might be all the Spurs need (Hopefully). Can you agree???? James R agree?Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
|
#33
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ |
|
#34
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ U.S. Marine - no better friend, no worse enemy. |
|
#35
| ||||
| ||||
|
You know Rasho looked really active in the 4th qtr. and that may have alot to do with him resting in the 3rd. Narz wasn't really productive, he gets boxed out on every shot and only gets an occasional rebound. Yep, after last night Rasho made everyone realize that he DESERVES to be in the STARTING LINEUP. Rasho was on last night, POP needs to keep using him in the same manner so he is fresh during the 4th qtr. 2 hips for Rasho! HIP, HIP HORRRRAY!!! |
|
#36
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
A quarterly rebound (a rebound for each quarter played) ![]() Becuase right now that what Rasho is doing, 4 boards a game. And somehow he's playing better then ever to some ![]() That will be some bargin in a few years when's he's making 8 million bucks.
__________________ |
|
#38
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Are you: A) Female? B) Attending UTSA? Then chances are good that YOU ALMOST FREAKING KILLED ME IN THE PARKING LOT |
|
#39
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ It is what it is -- Bruce Bowen When everyone thinks alike, no one thinks.-- Bill Walton |
|
#40
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#41
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
This just shows you how bad our Centers are since he is our best supposedly, we have one of the weakest starting Centers in the L on our team. Even Olowakandi (Who people would just praise how he played against Tim last tie if he was on the team) and Dampier who we all make fun of in here do things from time to time and even put up better stats than Rasho, but Rasho is playing great and they sukk..... Thats what makes me puzzled in here.Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
|
#42
| ||||
| ||||
|
Yeah these Rasho vs. Nazr threads are pretty awful. Its amazing how much everybodys perception of what Rasho is or isn't doing varies. Makes "debating" about it almost pointless. I'm with Manu, and the many others on forum on this one. Its the intangibles that make Rasho important at this point in time. Its not how attractive his boxscore is. I think people are expecting too much out of him. I mean, it is Rasho were talking here. |
|
#43
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
|
#44
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ It is what it is -- Bruce Bowen When everyone thinks alike, no one thinks.-- Bill Walton |
|
#45
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#46
| ||||
| ||||
|
Just to make sure my post about Rasho vs. Nazr doesn't miss these multiple threads: http://www.spursreport.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=10 Quote:
What do you want him to do? More importantly what do you want Nazr to do? Let's talk about this for a sec. Say Rasho sets a screen on an iso, for TP. TP gets an easy layup. Did he help the team or not? Say Nazr sets a screen for TP. But he has to be guided to where, which basically takes more time off the clock and then TP has a harder layup attempt, Is Nazr helping the team or not? That situation happens more often than you guys realize. Okay, say Rasho moves to the middle of the lane, right where you're supposed to be, a would be perimiter player finds the lane practically unapproachable with Rasho and Tim in the lane, so he backs off. Did Rasho help or not? Say Nazr, does the same thing, but then the perimeter player swings the ball to the right at the arc, and Nazr, as he is prone to do, steps out to challenge that pass 20 feet from the hoop. Is Nazr helping or not? See what I mean? Can't you guys at least acknowledge that the possibility that Rasho doesn't do as much statistically is because, like Bruce, he is filling his role to a tee? When Bruce was letting TMac and Kobe average 35 on him, did we gang up on his inability to stop those guys? No, we looked and saw that for those guys to get that 35, they needed 35 shots. That meant that his other teammates would never get into the flow of the game. For Rasho, outside of Shaq, maybe Yao, and possibly, Ilgauskas...the rest of the guys he guards won't take 20 shots per game. So we won't often see that pivotal OOH moment like we do when Bruce gets stops. What we'll probably see is a challenged shot, perhaps a 24 second violation, or a good front screen for a rebound that falls to Tim or Manu. Again I ask, is that such a bad thing? Offensively, he is defering shots to better quality O players and on D, he challenges well, and he is where the team EXPECTS a center to be on every rotation
__________________ Let's Have A Black Celebration!!! -Depeche Mode 1986 ![]() ![]() |
|
#47
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
|
#48
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Have I in any way even tried responding to you specifically? Have I tried to force you into believing anything?... Get off my nuts already. Youre only making these threads crappier than they already are.Maybe youre so pissy because youre expecting Rasho Nesterovic to be David Robinson all of a sudden. As Ive seen you mention him twice in this "debate". |
|
#49
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ “The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |