Originally Posted by tabspur
I'll say this again. Giving that contract to Manu, ALLOWS us to spend more. A lesser contract, we are under the cap, by a little, and we have no more available $. So, if Holt is ok with spending a few extra (under luxury tax for sure), and we can still add a player of need, this all makes sense. And for all of the complaining on this particular board, if the Spurs had let Manu sign elsewhere, for slightly more, they would have had a fan mutiny on their hands.
And yet in the Bonner Farewell tour thread, you're all for giving Bonner all his money under the amnesty program. And you claim it would allow more money to sign someone else.
Which is it? Just curious, since absolutely nothing offered on this board means squat in the actual future of the Spurs.