Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose_TheGenius  he puts the ball in the hole like you said, isn't that a scorer?! Neal isn't a scorer. no one in the NBA thinks he's a scorer, no analyst thinks he's a scorer. there's a reason why some are great shooters and others are great scorers. you never hear Ray Allen being called a great scorer nor Reggie Miller because they were great shooters.
i'm not lying lol Bonner is putting the ball in the hole at a high %, so by your definition, he's a scorer. the part where your Neal/Bonner argument and the lie of me "lying" falls apart when Bonner AND Neal are in the game for the same purpose: to stretch the floor and shoot 3's. they both do the same thing, so if you're going to label one something, you have to label the other the same. | Yes! Allen though could drive inside at times and finish unlike Neal! He was a great shooter though you are right and thats what he is known as. This is a good post Jose.
Neal is a specialist moreso, a volume shooter at times and that is where the line is drawn on that guy as he can't run the point well (Last year anyways) and he can't defend worth a sh*t out there. He is a guy you like on your team yeah for some clutch shots and threes, but other than that he can't drive the ball to the hoop nor pass like a true PG.
__________________
“The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times. When you fly a Phantom, it’s built for 2.0, but when you fly that fast you know it. It’s like sitting on a beach ball; you don’t know which way it’ll go, it’s so sensitive. In a F-14 it’s like sitting in a Cadillac. It’s solid. You don’t realize you’re going that fast.
|