Originally Posted by shelden
In re-reading the transcript of this interview, Jackson clearly says that he saw nothing wrong with sleeping in the same bed with his young overnight guests. I find it horrifying that he freely admits this (with his lawyer present) and am suspicious that he would pay out such large amounts of money if he was innocent of any wrong-doing.
I'm not even going to open the whole "What has he done to his own children?" topic.
So then, on the basis of his unorthodox but nonetheless reasonable views, he should be libeled?
Unless you present firsthand evidence that Jackson did, in fact, molest those children I don't see how it isn't libel.